Warschauer Kniefall

.

December 7, 1970. It was a crowning end to his first year in office. Later that day, Willy Brandt would sign a treaty in Warsaw, which effectively acknowledged the de facto post-war borders between Germany and Poland, drawn along the Oder-Neisse Line (thereby renouncing a stance that West Germany had maintained since the war: that 40,000 sq. mi. lands in Silesia, East Prussia, Pomerania belonged to the country). But it was his act of penance at the monument to Warsaw Ghetto Uprising that spoke louder than any treaty that rapproachment was well on the way in central Europe.

The Warsaw Ghetto Uprising in then the Nazi-occupied General Government of Poland was the largest single revolt by the Jews during the Holocaust.  The poorly armed effort to resist transportation of the remaining ghetto population to the Treblinka extermination camp was brutally crushed by the Nazi authorities. Willy Brandt remembered in his 1992 memoir:

It was a great burden I carried with me to Warsaw. Nowhere had a nation and its people suffered as they did in Poland. The routine extermination of Polish Jews took bloodlust to lengths no one would have thought possible. Who can name all the Jews from Poland, and other parts of Europe, who were annihilated in Auschwitz alone? The memory of six million murder victims lay along my road to Warsaw, and the memory of the fight to the death of the Warsaw ghetto, which I had followed from my observation post in Stockholm, and of which the governments fighting Hitler had taken hardly any more notice than they did of the heroic rising of the Polish capital itself a few months later.

On the morning after my arrival, my Warsaw programme contained two wreath-laying ceremonies, the first at the grave of the Unknown Soldier. There, I remembered the victims of violence and treachery. The screens and newspapers of the world featured a picture that showed me kneeling — before the memorial dedicated to the Jewish ghetto of the city and its dead. I have often been asked what the idea behind that gesture was: had it been planned in advance? No, it had not. My close colleagues were as surprised as the reporters and photographers with me, and as those who did not attend the ceremony because they could see no ‘story’ in it.

I had not planned anything, but I had left Wilanow Castle, where I was staying, with a feeling that I must express the exceptional significance of the ghetto memorial. From the bottom of the abyss of German history, under the burden of millions of victims of murder, I did what human beings do when speech fails them.

Even twenty years later, I cannot say more than the reporter whose account ran: ‘Then he who does not need to kneel knelt, on behalf of all who do need to kneel but do not — because they dare not, or cannot, or cannot dare to kneel.’

At home in the Federal Republic, there was no lack of questions, either malicious or foolish, as to whether the gesture had not been ‘overdone’. I noted embarrassment on the Polish side.  The day after the incident, none of my hosts referred to it. I concluded that others besides ourselves had not yet digested this chapter of history.

Carlo Schmid, who was with me in Warsaw, told me later that he had been asked why, at the grave of the Unknown Solider, I only laid wreath and did not kneel. Next morning, in the car on the way to the airport, [Polish Premier] Cyrankiewicz took my arm and told me that the gesture had in fact touched many people; his wife hand telephoned a friends of hers in Vienna that evening, and both women shed bitter tears.

The moment made the cover of Der Spiegel but in the magazine’s survey, 48% of all West Germans thought the gesture was excessive (41% said it was appropriate and 11% had no opinion). The opposition tried to use the Kniefall against Brandt with a vote of No Confidence in April 1972 which he survived by only two votes. However, Brandt’s Ostpolitik and Kniefall helped his reelection: his reformist policies underscored that after years of evasion, Germany was finally ready to repent and commit to liberal values.  Within a few weeks after the Kniefall, he was Time magazine’s ‘Man of the Year’ and the following year, he won the Nobel Peace Prize — the first German to be thus honored since 1935.

Various photos from several angles ran in the following day’s papers across the world. The photo above, by Sven Simon which ran on the cover of Der Spiegel, has all the qualities of an alterpiece — the black bulk of the coat and religious connotations of the kneeling creates ephemeral and poetic moment. However, it was not Simon, nor other photographers that defined that photo. It was Brandt who was the true maker of this photograph.

10 thoughts on “Warschauer Kniefall”

  1. […] 24. November 2009 in Bildreport, Diverse Angebote, Fisch und Fleisch, politics in a nutshell | Tags: body talk, Israel, Politik Besucht man in einer politisch und historisch belasteten Konstellation eine Gedenkstätte, ist von allzu breitbeinigem Auftreten abzusehen, wie klassische historische Fallbeispiele belegen: klick. […]

  2. […] In the entire Europe there is no battlefield more blood-stained than Verdun, where in 1916 nearly 800,000 French and German soldiers were killed or wounded in an inconclusive fight over a few square miles of territory. On 22 September 1984, German Chancellor Helmut Kohl met the French president François Mitterrand at the Douaumont cemetery in Verdun. In front of the charnel house in which the remains of 150,000 French soldiers rest, two leaders stood in rain. Mitterrand extended a hand to Kohl, which the latter held in minutes-long gesture which became a symbolic gesture of reconciliation as much as Willy Brandt’s Warsaw Kneefall. […]

Leave a Reply