The Valley of the Shadow of Death

match1-large

match2-large

Both of the above pictures were taken during Crimea, but despite the confusing title ‘The Valley of the Shadow of Death”, it was not across this surface that the Light Brigade made its doomed charge. [Tennyson, in his poem “The Charge of the Light Brigade,” writes about “the valley of death,” not “the valley of the shadow of death”.]

This confusion might have been deliberately fostered by the photographer Roger Fenton himself who allegedly manipulated photos too. One of the pictures has several cannonballs on the road, the other portrays an empty road. Opinions differ concerning which one was taken first. Some note the photo without the cannonballs was taken first, and Fenton deliberately placed them on the road to enhance the image. Some say the photo with cannonballs was taken first, and the soldiers in the process of removing them for reuse. Long essay were written about these pictures, which along with the Charge of the Light Brigade itself, is one of the enduring mysteries of the Crimean War.

Roger Fenton –who once studied in the studio of Paul Delaroche — was a well-to-do Englishman who left a career in law to devote himself to photography. He went to Crimea to produce the world’s first war coverage at the urging of Prince Albert, who wanted to show to the British public the horrors of war. However, the size of his equipment and the primitive nature of photography meant that he could only take pictures of unmoving and posed pictures; Fenton’s Crimean War pictures were considered to be discrete by the bloody standards of battlefield imagery to come. On his return, he showed his images in London and Paris, but they were never popular. By 1862, he had abandoned photography and returned to law practice. Fenton died forgotten, even by the Royal Photographic Society which he helped found in 1853.

7 thoughts on “The Valley of the Shadow of Death

    • There’s more evidence than just numbers and positions of cannonballs.

      In center-field there’s a very prominent rock that gets dislodged as a cannonball knocks another cannonball out of the way.

      Therefore the cannonballs were neither “deliberately placed” nor “removed for reused”. The images are in fact a genuine before and after a volley.

      Further evidence is the LACK of impact divits where missing cannonballs are in the “earlier image”. This further rules out that cannonballs were removed. Leaving only the possibility that they were “deliberately placed”.

      But again, as mentioned above, there are many stones that are ALSO dislodged. And there are cannonballs that are likewise dislodged. Which makes little sense in the placement theory.

  1. Fenton and the photos were featured in this week’s Radiolab. It’s what lead me here. Errol Morris examined the photos as part of his new book and found that the pictures of the cannonballs scattered on the hillside were taken first and the pictures of them in the road was taken second. Great write-up.

Leave a Reply to Adriene Mclelland Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s