Fall of Saddam

top10_protests_saddam

In 2009, Time magazine looks back at the fall of Saddam Hussein’s statue the middle of Baghdad: “While the advisability of the U.S. invasion of Iraq will long be a matter of debate, the overthrow of one of the world’s most notorious dictators was inarguably a moment of jubilation for many Iraqis. On April 9, 2003, as U.S. troops moved into Baghdad, Iraqi citizens slipped a noose around the neck of a statue of Saddam Hussein in Firdos Square and dragged it from its plinth, with the assistance of a detachment of U.S. Marines and their armored vehicle. The towering statue subsequently beheaded and dragged through the streets. The effusive demonstration was a stunning symbol of the nation’s liberation from Saddam’s brutal regime.”

The magazine was partially wrong. A year after the events, amidst the allegations that the event was staged, U.S. Army confirmed that the toppling was stage-managed by American troops and not a spontaneous reaction by Iraqis. A Marine colonel first decided to topple the statue, and an Army psychological operations unit turned the event into a propaganda moment (see pictures taken of the entire proceeding). At one point, Marines draped the statue of Saddam Hussein with an American flag. When the crowd reacted negatively to that gesture, the US flag was replaced with a pre-1990 Iraqi flag, missing the words “God is Great”. Then, the Marines brought in cheering Iraqi children in order to make the scene appear authentic, the Army report said.

Above is the photo taken by Patrick Baz for AFP/Getty. However, Reuter’s aerial photos showed Fardus Square empty save for the U.S. Marines, the Press, and a handful of Iraqis. There were no more than 200 people in the square, which had been sealed off and guarded by tanks.

saddam_statue

9 thoughts on “Fall of Saddam

  1. It was such a moment for the Iraqi people, hardly anyone was there as the photo shows. Probably too occupied digging their relatives out of the rubble from invasion.

  2. The two photos raise the question of the role of news agencies – Baz’s pic (top) accepts the role assigned by the US military, and he becomes party to a propaganda exercise. The bottom photo (taken from a hotel, I think, not actually an aerial photo) preserves the autonomy of the reporter, but I don’t think he can claim much credit for integrity – I recall that the photographers were kept in the hotel by the Marines.

  3. y a quien le importa esto?

    De cualquier manera nos estan controlando como quieren con los medios masivos,una guerra mas o una guerra menos, que importa? total, es son solo humanos.

  4. The problem with the “small crowds”, “crowd reacted negatively”, just “propaganda” line is that the whole thing was televised. I watched it. The crowds were large and friendly. There was no “negative reaction” by the crowd to the Marine who defiantly rubbed Saddam’s face with the American flag. In fact, the crowd dragged the head of the statue through the streets, hitting it with their shoes, and giving the camera man the thumbs up. So much for propaganda.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s