Garry Gross (1937-2010)

His name was well-known, even if it is whispered with muted distaste in photography and copyrights circles. His body of work is unknown, eclipsed by a single pictorial he undertook for American socialite Teri Shields. In 1975, Garry Gross scribbled his name into a dubious footnote in the history of photography by photographing a nude 10-year-old Brooke Shields. The photos of bejeweled soon-to-be-child-actress, in thick makeup and in a steaming, ornate bathtub, however, wouldn’t become known outside the arts community for another three years.

After seeing the photos Louis Malle cast Brooke Shields as a child prostitute in Pretty Baby, his acclaimed movie set during the last months of legal prostitution in New Orleans. The rest was history — and a rancorous one as that. Some two decades after New York’s highest court ruled that the photos are not “sexually suggestive, provocative or pornographic” and are distributable as long as they are not included in pornographic publications, the public remains as divided as ever before on the issue. On this blog, the post of Brooke Shields which detailed the controversy remains the most visited entry, and comments there represent a veritable cross-section of pluralistic viewpoints and range from informed to inane.

As for Garry Gross, he didn’t share the spotlight created by the controversy. His name was mentioned sporadically as the Brooke Shields controversy raged on, as when the famed appropriationist Richard Prince, who photographs other people’s photographs and exhibits them, dug this hoary old chestnut up again in 2007. “The photo has been infamous from the day I took it and I intended it to be…. she was supposed to look like a sexy woman,” Gross admitted to the Daily Telegraph then. But apart from occasional interview, Gross remained in semi-retirement. He was shunned by the society and rejected by galleries which were hesitant to court controversy by staging Gross exhibits. Never returning to celebrity photography, Garry Gross worked and died as a humble dog photographer and trainer. He is 73.

 

38 thoughts on “Garry Gross (1937-2010)

  1. There’s a mistake, in this post is said that the photoshoot took place in 1975, but in the original post, it reads: “In July 1978, at the age of thirteen, Brooke Shields made front page news in Photo Magazine…”

    Which date is the correct one?

    Cheers

  2. The mistake is yours, Jose:

    The entry clearly states that although the photo was “taken” in 1975, it “wouldn’t become known outside the arts community for another three years.”

    By that he means they were not “published” until 3-years later: 1978.

  3. Why post yet another picture of prepubescent Brooke Shields. There’s enough traffic with the earlier items. No need to belabor this photographer and controversy. In fact, it seems improper for all obvious reasons to do so.

      • You have pedophiles all over your comments section to this article. They are clearly coming here to use the images as pornography.

  4. […] Garry Gross (1937-2010) « Iconic Photos His name was well-known, even if it is whispered with muted distaste in photography and copyrights circles. His body of work is unknown, eclipsed by a single pictorial he undertook for American socialite Teri Shields. In 1975, Garry Gross scribbled his name into a dubious footnote in the history of photography by photographing a nude 10-year-old Brooke Shields. The photos of bejeweled soon-to-be-child-actress, in thick makeup and in a steaming, ornate bathtub, however, wouldn’t become known outside the arts community for another three years. […]

  5. for those that think this is child po*n…..it’s not. there has to be a sexual act.maybe if she fingered her vagina,that would be a bit different. i think pics of naked kids make some people uncomfortable.

    • the problem is that there is an obviously sexual element. she is wearing makeup, in an adult “sexy” pose. this isnt a little kid jsut playing in he tub. this is a child posed to look like an adult.

    • Absolutely agree with mark.
      I don’t really see the “obvious” sexual element.
      What one finds sexual is subjective, sexual act is not.

      And can’t see the “harm” with this image either.
      I think many people behave hysterically when they see child nudity when there is absolutely no reason to.

      • I agree Eugene! I think its natural beauty at its best! I love the beauty of an innocent child!

  6. I do not think this is child porn, because she is not showing her Vagina or pussy and her naked and her naked butt is not showing neither, I see her Nipples, but she has the chest of a boy and therefore this is not child porn, this is nothing but consensual Art of a Child.

  7. Brooke Shields wants these within her rights but was denied her own image. She was a child who could not consent to having photos like this taken. She obviously is not comfortable and it is wrong to distribute these against the wishes of the actual human who is pictured. Artists can be so elitist and violate the bodily autonomy of their subjects in cases like this where her mother consented to these and the poor girl had no choice.
    Not to mention, her entire career was her being pimped out for sexualized photos and movie roles that she didn’t even understand until she grew up and got away from the pedophile ring her mother was a part of. She was groomed from a very young age to do these things for thinly veiled pornography and adult entertainment.

  8. I Think these photos of a prepubescent brooke shields are the most beautiful thing ive ever seen! nothing wrong with pictures of naked children!

    • Very beautiful. Nothing wrong. It is only in a certain kind of mindset that makes something so beautiful seem wrong.

  9. It sucks that the news media and social media show blood and gore yet a picture of a naked girl is so terrible!

  10. Oddly enough she was only 10 when she was photographed naked but she did not have sex for the first time until she was 21! I wouldve love to been the lucky man who took her virginity!

  11. Yes I do have the movie pretty baby and I always pause it at the scene where she is naked on the couch! Yes I do jack off to her!

  12. I also have the original Willy Wonka and the chocolate factory on bluray! Julie Dawn Cole (AKA Varuca salt) is so sexy! the scene where she dances and kicks her leggs in the air you can see up her dress I pause that so I can jack off to that! Too bad she was wearing white tights instead of only panties! What a thrill that would have been!

  13. I think there is nothing wrong with having pictures of naked children! I think the age of consent should be lowered to pre-school age! No matter if she is only a child she has a pussy and a pussy was made for a man to stick his dick in! Theyre gonna learn sooner or later why not give em a head start in life! Legalize and accept pedophilia just like the gay lesbian and transgender lifestyle is! It is more natural and beautiful!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s